-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature: ReactiveArgumentResolver #1263
Comments
Thanks for opening the issue. We have some basic reactive support but haven't yet fully explored all the aspects required to make it first-class in the framework. This is primarily due to the fact that we haven't widely adopted it internally. It's great to get an idea of all the existing gaps so we can prioritize for future. |
One requirement is to use the I think this is the biggest requirement for anyone who wants to use Reactive Dgs. |
Hi @srinivasankavitha, do you have any update on this? |
We won't be prioritizing this feature for now, since we don't use reactive stack internally. However, we are working on a release that integrates with spring-graphql in the coming weeks. With that, perhaps I am expecting you should be able leverage the support that is available for reactive stack from spring-graphql. |
Describe the Feature Request
As of now is only possible to resolve non reactive arguments using the
ArgumentResolver
interface.Will be cool to be able to resolve as well some reactive arguments for instance to get a claim from the token using the
ReactiveSecurityContextHolder.getContext()
.Describe Preferred Solution
Have a
ReactiveArgumentResolver
interface or some other approach to would enable to return Mono on anArgumentResolver
.Describe Alternatives
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: