[Taxonomy Tree]: Requesting additional ring/jewelry attributes

[doeixd]

Taxonomy Field

Attributes

Vertical

No response

Change Type

New category or attribute

Issue

Missing stone information, and materials are too coarse

Description

Hello, I currently work with a jewelry company selling on Shopify, and there are a few ring attributes that I believe would be helpful.

First, under Ring Attributes > Ring Design, I believe adding Filigree, and Engagement would be helpful.

Next, under Ring Attributes > Jewelry Type, I believe adding Vintage would be useful.

Also, I noticed that there aren't really any attributes regarding a ring's stone, which is one of the main ways people search for rings.

People normally look for the stone type, cut, origin (lab, natural, imitation, etc.), quality/karats, and setting. All of which I didn't find upon a cursory look through the explorer.

If you'd like more information on common values for the stone attributes, I'd be happy to assist with that.

Additionally, when it comes to the Jewelry Material attribute, I think it should be separated into three different attributes: Base Material, Plating Material, and Plating Type. Because there can be basically any combination of these three, and it doesn't make sense to have them all listed under material (I could see that exploding pretty quickly)?

For example, there is a huge difference in price and quality between jewelry that is brass base with gold electroplate, or a rolled gold-plated piece on a pure silver base. (There could be a 10x difference in price, but right now they are both listed as: "Gold Plated")

Also, there is regulation around calling items '__ Plated' and only having the coarse-grained options currently available, might be misleading to some.

Thanks.

Video/Screenshot

No response

Store Public URL

https://pvdvintagejewelry.com/collections/antique-vintage-rings