Should the service be named *Runner or *Command?

[tukusejssirs]

I understand that the name of the service could be anything, but in the docs, you sometimes use *Runner (e.g. TaskRunner), else you use *Command (e.g. RunCommand, FooCommand).

At the very least, I think you should suggest to use only one or the other, unless there are some rules when to use which one.

What is you suggestion?

[jmcdo29]

I generally use FeatureCommand and that's what the schematic is set up to create. I think TaskCommand sounded weird while I was writing the docs so I called it TaskRunner instead. It's all personal convention as to what you like the best though.

[tukusejssirs]

Yeah, I too think that using *Command sounds better, as the command class extends the runner class, which makes sense to me.

Thanks for the explanation. 🙏 Anyway, TaskCommand does not sound weird to be, YMMV though. 😉