-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking issue for kube-vip workaround introduced for v1.29 #2596
Comments
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale /lifecycle frozen |
We should try to get rid of More information: kube-vip/kube-vip#684 (comment) |
|
Good. I can work on this |
Great! We were thinking about having an if/else (or enabledIf) based on Kubernetes version to stop adding these workaround patches for >= 1.31 |
@chrischdi could this (kubernetes/kubernetes#126460) somehow fix the first issue? |
Not really sure, but may be worth a try. |
Context: kubernetes/kubernetes#126460 was done because of this bug report related to kube-vip kubernetes/kubernetes#119852 |
This issue is for tracking the following two kube-vip issues:
We did hit this issue while implementing support for v1.29 for #2564 in:
As a follow-up we removed a part of the above PR because it caused flakes in e2e tests in:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: