Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support adding owner references to generated secrets and config maps #5822

Open
2 tasks done
jchanam opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.

Comments

@jchanam
Copy link

jchanam commented Dec 11, 2024

Eschewed features

  • This issue is not requesting templating, unstuctured edits, build-time side-effects from args or env vars, or any other eschewed feature.

What would you like to have added?

The possibility of adding an owner reference when generating a secret or configmap

Why is this needed?

Some generated secrets or configmaps lifecycle are coupled to another resource. For example, we can create a job to be run together with a secret. When that job is completed and removed (thanks to a TTL), the secret should be gone to as it's no longer needed.

Can you accomplish the motivating task without this feature, and if so, how?

The only way would be a custom mutating webhook, reading for example an annotation and creating the owner reference. This way is extremely hacky and complex.

What other solutions have you considered?

Have a cronjob to delete old secrets that no longer are used.

Anything else we should know?

No response

Feature ownership

  • I am interested in contributing this feature myself! 🎉
@jchanam jchanam added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Dec 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Dec 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

SIG CLI takes a lead on issue triage for this repo, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the triage/accepted label.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants