Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PyLadies Website 2.0 Migration #54

Open
albendz opened this issue Jun 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

PyLadies Website 2.0 Migration #54

albendz opened this issue Jun 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@albendz
Copy link
Contributor

albendz commented Jun 20, 2020

Rebuilding the Pyladies blog will require breakup up what we have in the current repo and determining what needs to be moved into the new blog.

First task: How do we manage issues across https://github.com/pyladies/pyladies and https://github.com/albendz/project-communications

Some open questions to discuss:
What infrastructure changes will we need? New repos, admin, CICD
We need documentation on what is currently hosted in the repo: blog posts, assets, chapter specific content, documentation
For each entity in the repo, where should it go in the future?
What is the initial v1 scope for website 2.0?
What tech should we use for website 2.0?
What does release look like? Start with new content only, backfill old content, what pages should be available first?
Move blog and content publishing related content to the comms project?
Define what belongs in the comms project vs. the pyladies blog hosting repo
Process on how chapters can add new content

Issue in Pyladies project: pyladies/pyladies#482

@albendz
Copy link
Contributor Author

albendz commented Jun 20, 2020

Related: pyladies/pyladies#475

@albendz
Copy link
Contributor Author

albendz commented Jun 20, 2020

Per suggestion from Lorena, we can use Github submodules for chapters: pyladies/pyladies#475 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants