Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Canaries] Failing Android ChipGroup Selection Tests #1300

Open
kazo0 opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Canaries] Failing Android ChipGroup Selection Tests #1300

kazo0 opened this issue Dec 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/tests Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to testing control/chip-chipgroup kind/bug Something isn't working kind/regression Something was working, now it isn't

Comments

@kazo0
Copy link
Contributor

kazo0 commented Dec 6, 2024

Issue to track test failures on the canaries for the ChipGroup Selection Tests

6 unit test(s) failed (count=6).
Failing Tests:

  1. VariousMode_TapSelection (Single,System.Int32[],0)
  2. VariousMode_TapSelection (Single,System.Int32[],1)
  3. VariousMode_TapSelection (Single,System.Int32[],1)
  4. VariousMode_TapSelection (Single,System.Int32[],2)
  5. Single_SetSelection()
  6. Initial_Selection()

Details:
Failed: VariousMode_TapSelection (Single,System.Int32[],0) [AssertFailedException]
Assert.AreEqual failed. Expected:<0>. Actual:<(null)>.

Failed: VariousMode_TapSelection (Single,System.Int32[],1) [AssertFailedException]
Assert.AreEqual failed. Expected:<0>. Actual:<(null)>.

Failed: VariousMode_TapSelection (Single,System.Int32[],1) [AssertFailedException]
Assert.AreEqual failed. Expected:<0>. Actual:<(null)>.

Failed: VariousMode_TapSelection (Single,System.Int32[],2) [AssertFailedException]
Assert.AreEqual failed. Expected:<0>. Actual:<(null)>.

Failed: Single_SetSelection() [AssertFailedException]
Assert.AreEqual failed. Expected:<0>. Actual:<(null)>.

Failed: Initial_Selection() [AssertFailedException]
Assert.AreEqual failed. Expected:<Uno.Toolkit.UI.Chip>. Actual:<(null)>. SelectedItem is expected to be container#0

@kazo0 kazo0 added kind/bug Something isn't working triage/untriaged Indicates an issue requires triaging or verification. labels Dec 6, 2024
@Xiaoy312 Xiaoy312 added kind/regression Something was working, now it isn't area/tests Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to testing control/chip-chipgroup and removed triage/untriaged Indicates an issue requires triaging or verification. labels Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/tests Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to testing control/chip-chipgroup kind/bug Something isn't working kind/regression Something was working, now it isn't
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants