Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Change RELAX NG reference #17

Open
rubensworks opened this issue Apr 7, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Change RELAX NG reference #17

rubensworks opened this issue Apr 7, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Comments

@rubensworks
Copy link
Member

As suggested by @domel in #13:

Can we change a RELAX NG reference? Now it refers to OASIS spec. There is also an ISO standard (ISO/IEC 19757-2:2003). OASIS is open but old. ISO version is more official and newer, but it is also close access.
@rubensworks rubensworks added the needs discussion Proposed for discussion in an upcoming meeting label Apr 7, 2023
@rubensworks rubensworks mentioned this issue Apr 7, 2023
Merged
@domel domel added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Apr 16, 2023
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

The place to do this would be in Specref, as it's defined there, and used at least in RDF/XML as well, if not many other places.

"RELAXNG"

"RELAXNG-COMPACT"

Note that "RELAXNG-SCHEMA" does reference iso.org.

Definitions can be updated via PR to the Specref repo.

@domel
Copy link
Contributor

domel commented Apr 18, 2023

Yes, and I propose to change RELAXNG and RELAXNG-COMPACT to RELAXNG-SCHEMA (note that ISO/IEC 19757-2:2008 aka RELAXNG-SCHEMA defines RNG and RNC). The question is should I prepare a PR?

@domel
Copy link
Contributor

domel commented May 18, 2023

@gkellogg Any thoughts?

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

RELAXNG-SCHEMA is the more up to date reference, and would make sense here and in RDF/XML.

@domel domel removed the needs discussion Proposed for discussion in an upcoming meeting label Jun 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@gkellogg @domel @rubensworks