-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NIFI-14109 Refactored remaining processors and control services to be uniform when creating properties and relationships. #9600
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
… uniform when creating properties and relationships.
relationships.addAll(getAdditionalRelationships()); | ||
this.relationships = Collections.unmodifiableSet(relationships); | ||
this.descriptors = Stream.concat( | ||
PROPERTIES.stream(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there no simpler/cleaner option than Stream.concat ... list.stream().... .toList()? Overall this is cleanear in some ways but does seem like there is a cleaner/simpler way of saying 'List from these lists'
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ public class AzureEventHubRecordSink extends AbstractControllerService implement | |||
|
|||
@Override | |||
protected List<PropertyDescriptor> getSupportedPropertyDescriptors() { | |||
return PROPERTY_DESCRIPTORS; | |||
return PROPERTIES; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I look through here it is clearly inconsistent whether we use the term properties, descriptors, or property descriptors. However, we should be careful. These things we're messing with in all these files are PropertyDescriptor objects. They're not actually properties. If we're going to establish more consistency we should consider using the term DESCRIPTOR or PROPERTY_DESCRIPTOR but probably not simply PROPERTIES
AMQP_VERSION, | ||
SSL_CONTEXT_SERVICE, | ||
USE_CERT_AUTHENTICATION | ||
); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here the parent class 'getCommonPropertyDescriptors' method is removed and instead a subclass is supposed to know to use the static list of descriptors as they build their own lists. I think this weakens what the author intended in building that class.
Also there is at least one example much later on in this PR where you kept the parent method. I think keeping the parent method better conveys intent to any subclassers.
Summary
NIFI-14109
Tracking
Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.
Issue Tracking
Pull Request Tracking
NIFI-00000
NIFI-00000
Pull Request Formatting
main
branchVerification
Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.
Build
mvn clean install -P contrib-check
Licensing
LICENSE
andNOTICE
filesDocumentation