-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Properly resolve referenced forms. #3094
Open
geoffrey-eisenbarth
wants to merge
3
commits into
bigskysoftware:dev
Choose a base branch
from
geoffrey-eisenbarth:button-w-outside-form
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would you mind extracting this to a local variable to avoid the complicated expression in the parameter position, w/ maybe a comment explaining the situation?
thank you, PR looks great love the tests!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I addressed your request, but also there's been some discussion about a better way forward on #issues-and-pull-requests that I'm happy to implement (I am ironbeard on discord).
One thing that might need clarifying is the original intent of the sentence in the docs that this PR changes. Specifically, what kind of elements inside a form should also be sending form values on non-GET?
<select hx-post=/foo>
?<input type=text hx-post=/foo>
?<input type=submit hx-post=/foo>
?<div hx-post=/foo>
?Furthermore, personally I'm wondering why this is being limited to non-GET? Wouldn't we want to submit the entire form for e.g.
I'm actually not 100% on whether HTMX currently submits
bar=baz
in this situation or not (I haven't been able to find an associated test and I'm on mobile now), but the docs and the code appear to indicate that it won't. I will make sure to cover any of those situations with tests once I understand the specifics of that line in the docs.In case it's helpful, here's the original PR of that line in the docs: a3c9cf6#diff-c7d06af83d22e155470d44a366cc1ba76cd5dc9da3405fc9e54a237174736b6aR962
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
htmx has not submitted values for
GET
s that occur within a form so that link-like things do not include them when navigating. This behavior may not be ideal but we can't change it without breaking backwards compatibility. (In general at this point backwards compatibility is becoming more important than correctness in htmx.)I think the situation where the user has explicitly called out a form via the form attribute is obvious enough to fix so I'm in favor of this change so long as it minimizes any additional changes, in particular with an eye towards backwards compatibility.