Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed wordings in access-control doc for F#. #43965

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/fsharp/language-reference/access-control.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ In F#, the access control specifiers `public`, `internal`, and `private` can be

The access specifier is put in front of the name of the entity.

If no access specifier is used, the default is `public`, except for `let` bindings in a type, which are always `private` to the type.
If no access specifier is used, the default is `public`, except for `let` bindings in a type or a function, which are always `private` to the type.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let bindings inside a function will often become just stack values, which do not have any access modifier.
I would rather keep the original phrasing as it was.

If you want to expand on "functions declared within other functions", it should be its own sentence.


Signatures in F# provide another mechanism for controlling access to F# program elements. Signatures are not required for access control. For more information, see [Signatures](signature-files.md).

Expand Down
Loading