Vesync unload error when not all platforms used

[cdnninja]

Proposed change

Vesync errors on reload because in some cases not all platforms are used. The old code referenced the total platform list vs the in use list. Not sure if a more elegant way exists to get this data but this works. I was able to replicate the error and confirm resolved in my dev container.

This is referenced regularly as the error:

ValueError: Config entry was never loaded!

Example issues:

#131781
#131409

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #

• This PR is related to issue: VeSync not getting Devices #131409, VeSync gets devices but no relevant entities #131781

• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
• The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[home-assistant]

Hey there @markperdue, @webdjoe, @TheGardenMonkey, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (vesync) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of vesync can trigger bot actions by commenting:

• @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
• @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
• @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
• @home-assistant unassign vesync Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
• @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
• @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

[cdnninja]

@iprak fyi since you have another in flight vesync PR. I don't think they clash but wanted you to see this. Open to recommendations to simplify this.

[iprak]

What a coincidence. I had fixed this locally as well by saving off the platforms actually used.

    hass.data[DOMAIN][VS_PLATFORMS] = platforms
...

async def async_unload_entry(hass: HomeAssistant, entry: ConfigEntry) -> bool:
    """Unload a config entry."""
    # Only unload platforms which we had processed
    platforms = hass.data[DOMAIN].get(VS_PLATFORMS)
    unload_ok = (
        await hass.config_entries.async_unload_platforms(entry, platforms)
        if platforms
        else True
    )
    if unload_ok:
        hass.data.pop(DOMAIN)

    return unload_ok

[cdnninja]

I was looking at that approach but this section of code updates platforms so needs to also be updated. https://github.com/cdnninja/core/blob/0ad8c4afff72c3eab55a9253c186b2023cf90991/homeassistant/components/vesync/__init__.py#L75-L127

So figured lots of lines of code. I am good with either approach though!

[iprak]

I was looking at that approach but this section of code updates platforms so needs to also be updated. https://github.com/cdnninja/core/blob/0ad8c4afff72c3eab55a9253c186b2023cf90991/homeassistant/components/vesync/__init__.py#L75-L127

So figured lots of lines of code. I am good with either approach though!

I missed that. Yes, your change will cover that as well.